|
Market is supreme.
No other entity is powerful than the
market itself. It has its own rules, fundas
and theories. One of the most crucial aspect
of market functioning is "it discount
everything well in advance". The stock price moves
first and the news always appears later on rather than stock prices chasing the news.
(mystock has hundreds of live example which proves this). Market(
i.e. price movements) always judge the things which are yet to be unfold.
Its a collective outcome of continues battle between bulls and bears,
insiders and general public, smart investors and late followers.
Take a example, when
Infosys was quoting (Feb/March 2000) around Rs.13500 when the tech stocks, world over, were
soaring like anything, NASDAQ was creating new histories how many investors
have foreseen impending technology sector crash/slowdown, world over and
more particular in Silicon valley?. Hardly few. But look at the share price
movements of Infosys or NASDAQ. The price charts were clearly suggested a
bearish trend when the tech stocks were started tumbling, but investors were
in buying spree. Subsequently when all the tech stock, world over, crashed
by 20-30% from their peak levels, the news were started flowing that there
is a chances of slow down in the tech sector and the dot com bubble
has been bust. Some investors were never believed on these news and continue
their buying spree considering attractive valuation from fundamental
perspective. After some time the real story come out and every one on the
street was convinced that there is indeed a slowdown in the technology
sector but by the time Infosys tumbled from high of 13500 to 2200, Nasdaq
witnessed a 70% value erosion in the span of just in 18 months.
The moral of the storey is,
"market has already discounted the good news in the stocks and started
discounting/visualizing the downside (so far unknown to the world) of the great technology bubble. The
most interesting part is that those who have sold Infosys at 10000+ level
were also not exactly aware of what is going to happen in future. mystock
had also advised sell call, across the software stocks, in March 2000, but
never known what will happen after 2 years. But one thing was quite sure the
investment trend was completely bearish.
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
See Sensex chart for last 25 years. In April 1988 Sensex was quoting
around 390 level. In the next 4 years it has scaled to new historic high of
4546. That is a sensational rise of 1068% in just 4 years. No doubt some
credit goes to late Mr. Harshad Mehta, but he really dominated the market in
the fag end of the bull run (year 91-92 when Sensex was moved from 2400 to
4500). Even though one could have neglected the manipulation by Harshad
Mehta, still you have spectacular bull run which had given 1000% returns in
just 4 years and in subsequent corrections market never witnessed a fall
below 2100. The interesting point is what exactly happened in these 4
years?. Do you remember? This was a pre-reform era, where
political/financial situation in the country was very fluid. The most young
and dynamic P.M. was assassinated. There was total chaos on social front in
the country.
What could have happed in
these 4 years, so that Sensex has moved from 400 to 4500?. (Remember, if
this could have been just speculative rise, then in subsequent years it
should have completely retrace the entire rise, but in fact Sensex has never
tumbled below 3000 level for the next 10 years, proving that is was not just
speculative rise). Puzzled!.
Reality was that, there was
just rumors of economic and financial reforms, entry of foreigners in the
Indian equity markets etc.etc. The political and economic think tanks were
busy exploring the new economic model for sustainable growth and removal of
poverty in the country. The world was changing very rapidly. So as usual
market started discounting the future and stock prices skyrocketed in these
4 years despite of all sorts of bad news. When everyone was surprised and
shocked with this rise, market was indicating towards a great future for the
country.
In subsequent years when
the country really opened the floodgates of reforms (visualized by market in
1988-92) in Corporate/Financial sectors, market stopped moving up. Sensex
was stuck in range of 3000-4500 level for almost 11 years (from 1992-2003,
except one blip upto 6100 in tech rally). These moves in Sensex were
again confusing. When the country was yet to open up, yet to start economic
reforms, Sensex catapulted from 400 to 4500, but when the real reform
process started, it fumbled and stucked in range bound move nearly for a
decade. Why?
Because, when the country
started genuine reform process, market went into hibernation mode and started
discounting each and every reform process, its impact on the economy and
corporate world & bla bla bla. And now when it is convinced the real "India
story", it has permanently(?) forgotten the range of 4500-5000 for the Sensex
and started climbing up.
Take another example, somewhere in 2003, few
smart/intelligent analyst of Goldman Sachs published the now world famous
"BRIC" report indicating the financial prowess of Brazil, Russia, India and
china cornering 40% of world economic growth. And equally projecting "India
" as world's 3rd largest economy by 2040". If we believe in the astonishing
capacity of the equity markets to discount the future more
rapidly and more perfectly rather than any conventional model, where will be
the Sensex after 10-15 years?. Do you really think that Sensex will wait
till we are at number 3 or will it start discounting the things much
earlier, say in the next decade or so, by catapulting to more than 20000+ ?
Check out the world news
on General motors and Ford motors. There is a speculation in the world about
collapse of these two great companies and the bonds are already been
downgraded to junk status. Now see the accompanied stock price chart
of General Motors (New York stock exchange, prices in $).
Somewhere in 99, more
specifically, on week ended on 07.05.99 stock price of G.M. has scaled to
all time high of $94.88. Subsequently after crashing to $59.75 on 13.08.99,
it has once again started its upward march and scaled to $94.63 on 28.04.00.
This stock price movement of G.M. for almost one year has inadvertently,
unknowingly created one of the most powerful bearish pattern called "Double
top" at $94, signaling a impending bearish trend for next few months/years.
Since then stock price started moving down, slowly & steadily, discounting
all quarterly, half yearly and yearly financial data, movements of crude oil
prices, consumer preference index etc etc. There were alternate bullish and
bearish bounce in stock price of G.M. but the long term trend was perfectly
down and most recently stock price has made a 13 year low of $24.67 on
19.04.05 (that is nearly 5 years after the double top bearish pattern on
charts).
In short, inadvertently,
unknowingly stock prices were indicating to the world that something is
wrong in G.M., its financial outlook is not so good. But real bad news
started flowing in just few months back, in short price moves has
outperformed the news flow by wide margins.
So when the common investor
is busy in analyzing the recent quarterly results of Infosys or Ranbaxy,
stock price is in the process of discounting the next 4 quarters results.
That's why we witnessed erratic moves after declaration of results or any
fundamental announcement by management of the company. And usually bad financial
results/news leads to upward price movement in stock and good
financial outcome/news leads to crash in stock prices on the day of
the announcement or subsequent trading sessions. Because market
(stock price) has already discounted the future well ahead of you and me.
"Stock market is the
leading indicator of the economy rather than lagging indicator" &
Technical analysis, help us to know the future trend of the market in better
ways rather than just fundamental study of the stock/economy. So next time,
whenever you read strongly bullish news about any stock in the financial
newspapers or on any "commercial T.V. channels", just think that you are the
last person to know this information and arguably you are the part of the
"group" to whom the "insiders" are likely to distribute the stocks which
they have already purchased. |